News reports of the arrest of Bristol Isaac by the Punch Newspapers has the accused doing two opposite things: A police spokesperson says Bristol "locked himself in the hotel room, smashed his phone, and flushed it down the toilet to destroy evidence. He also refused to surrender his phone's password, claiming he had forgotten it, thereby concealing information".
Our question is, if Bristol Isaac already smashed his phone and flushed it down the toilet to destroy evidence, WHICH PHONE'S PASSWORD DID HE REFUSE TO SURRENDER, CLAIMING HE HAD FORGOTTEN IT? Does a smashed phone flushed down the toilet still have passwords?
We expect the police and their supporters to defend this possibly by saying that Bristol had more than one phone. If so, we ask: "What would make a person trying to destroy evidence to destroy one evidence-bearing device and leave another?" For us, this seems indefensible but we are open to any contrary opinion if anyone has a credible one.
So, both the police and their supporters can answer these questions here👇 before the public eyes for the sake of transparency and accountability.
Please, locate the 'SHARE' link below. Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment
Let's share. Contribute your thoughts to this discussion below...